More Sci-Fi Book Covers : Odd John And Human Abstractions
While the sci-fi paperback genre has always been replete with busty warrior women who are impossibly ill-equipped to deal with marauding dragons, or impractically designed space vessels hovering above rainbow-hued planets, or if you’re lucky, a really freaking insane monster that’s mostly made of teeth, some of my favorite covers include none of these obvious things. While I’ve had a difficult time finding any that were published after the 1970s, I’m a fan of the ‘human abstraction’.
There’s no doubt that once you see a warrior chick or crazy beast on the cover of a sci-fi book, it’s the image that’s planted firmly in your head from introduction to final chapter, whether or not these descriptions fit what the author actually describes. Much of the time, the illustrator is given a brief synopsis of what the story entails, and a quick outline of what the main character may look like. There’s little nuance, and an illustrator on a deadline usually won’t have time to sit down and read through the entire book to seek all of the vital details out.

While Ray Bradbury’s ‘The Food of the Gods‘ (1964 Popular Library Eagle Books edition) isn’t an ‘abstraction’ as much as a non-literal interpretation of a human head, it doesn’t ruin the form of what might be inside of the book itself. This particular painting, ‘Head’ by Pavel Tchelitchew, was not created specifically for this book, but the publishers thought that it fit. Tchelitchew was actually a well-known Surrealist painter who died seven years before this edition of ‘Gods’ was even published.

‘Earthblood‘ by Keith Laumer and Rosel George Brown uses another abstracted humanoid figure on its 1966 Berkeley Medallion edition. A little bit of digging reveals that the artist of this cover is Richard Powers, who dabbled equally in Surrealist designs and the obligatory ‘hot alien’ chick cover. He’s considered revolutionary enough, and justifiably so, to have warranted a book completely about his artwork.

‘Odd John’ by Olaf Stapledon is regarded as a fairly important work of science fiction, and if the blurred signature in the corner of the image says what I think it does, this is another beautiful work by Powers. There aren’t many reliable web resources about Powers.
This is also a title that saw a few more interpretations which aren’t quite as creative. We have the alien-faced cover…

… and the sensationalist, sexy cover. The fact that one book can be interpreted so many different ways is either a really great, or really terrifying, thing.

Early Penguin paperbacks also explored a more abstracted view of science fiction also, with beautiful results. Forget about the starships – I want the vague implication of a human head and my imagination.


And for no really good reason, except that it’s my new favorite paperback cover, I present to you ‘Who?‘


Trout was originally created to act as an homage to Vonnegut’s friend, Theodore Sturgeon – one of Vonnegut’s typically blunt, heavy puns. As the character grew, it became clearer that Trout, who is a struggling (and often pathetic) author of science fiction, was also very much an aspect of Kurt Vonnegut himself. The fictional Trout lived in obscurity, having roughly three fans in the whole world (all dedicated collectors), and writing hundreds of novels and short stories that didn’t really exist. Which made it very strange when I found a paperback with ‘Kilgore Trout’ listed as the author.
In actuality, ‘Venus’ was written by noted author Philip Jose Farmer. Farmer intended on writing at least a few books under the Trout pseudonym, but communicating with Vonnegut only through publishers and agents, it became clear that Vonnegut wasn’t interested in the project. Garbled interviews with both parties only made things worse, and after ‘Venus’, no more books were ever published under the Trout name, out of respect for Vonnegut’s wishes.
I’ll be the first to admit that I had a really, really hard time getting into Farsape during its initial run between 1999 and 2003. The stories can be a bit complex, the characters are complicated and the circumstances of the show are politically charged. This can either be a rich and fulfilling experience, or it can be frustrating for the casual viewer. I recall one particular college day when I was invited to watch some Farscape VHS tapes on a dorm couch and I could barely contain my plethora of questions that were inherent to my enjoyment of the show. Refusing to be a TV talker, I endured in bewildered silence.


And of course, when anyone is asked to name a black and white sci-fi hero, Buck Rogers is one of the first that will come to mind. Even my college dorm has a barely-functioning ‘
Inside, the figure itself rests in plastic packaging. Because of shipping issues from the overseas factory, the glass dome that rests over Buck’s head was shipped separately, but can still be stored within the plastic frame that the figure sits in. The removal and replacement of the figure in the package is supremely easy. The package itself contains a set of gloved hands, a holster to loop onto Buck’s belt, his die-cast iconic Disintegrator Pistol, a helmet, a certificate of authenticity, and a USB cable with some instructions. But why would an action figure need a USB cable? Because it is amazing is why. We’ll get to that part in a moment.






