11.20.08By Deanna Dahlsad
So I’m flipping through an issue of the National Enquirer from 1979, as I’m wont to do — don’t look at me like that, you’d do it too if you had some.
 Women Born From 1905 to 1909 Had The Fewest Children
Anyway, I find this snippet (buried on page 63 of the issue dated February 20, 1979), titled “Women Born From 1905 to 1909 Had The Fewest Children.” And it fascinates me.
You know how I love to read about that feminist stuff — or, as some might say, turn everything into feminist stuff. But there’s just the three scant paragraphs. And it’s the National Enquirer for gosh-sake.
So, being in ‘the library’ (yes, that’s a euphemism for the bathroom) and, still pondering the subject of childless women who were born in the early 1900’s, I reach for whatever other reading material might be laying in the magazine rack.
Through what, again, can only be described as the Serendipity Of The Collecting Gods, my hand finds a back issue of The Keynoter, the Journal of the American Political Items Conservators published by the American Political Items Collectors.
On page 42 of that Winter, 2007, issue is an article titled “I Am For Playgrounds” by Steve Baxley. It describes the story behind the William Howard Taft celluloid button bearing the same slogan.
 Taft: I Am For Playgrounds
You, like political memorabilia collector Steve Mihaly, might wonder why this would be a political slogan — after all, who could possibly not be for playgrounds?
Baxley explains how back in the 1890’s urban areas were opening play lots where children could play within urban areas. Baxley writes:
Many women involved in the women’s suffrage movement also became involved in the Mother’s and Children’s Movement, which tried to influence state and local legislators to pass legislation protecting women and child laborers and create schools, kindergartens, and playgrounds to keep children off the street. Though these women could not vote, they were very successful in influencing stare and local government officials in achieving these goals. By 1905, many of the larger cities were providing appropriations for the maintenance of playgrounds.
In 1906 the Playground Association of America was founded. President Taft supported the group’s work as well as appropriations for playgrounds; this is where the button comes from.
What’s all this got to do with the low birthrate among women born between 1905 and 1909 — the very girls who would have played on those playgrounds?
I don’t know. Not really.
But the historian in me must make (educated) guesses.
The women born between 1905 and 1909 were the same young girls who grew up during the years of the women’s suffrage movement in the US. They would have seen the struggle, heard the talk, and knew they could have greater freedom of choice in living their lives. They too would see, if not quite be, part of the flapper movement. Activism and parenting being almost completely at odds with one another, some may have opted not to have children — and at this time, birth control, thanks to Margaret Sanger, was becoming a realistic option.
And, just as these young women were perhaps thinking of starting a family…
Along comes The Great Depression — the one of that started about 1929, not the one some say we are approaching now — and the birthrate fell about one-tenth globally from the rate during the “prosperous” 1920’s. In America, the birth rate dropped below the replacement level for the first time in history.
Pretty good guesses, huh.
But then I have all my ephemera to thank for that. And my ‘library’ time.
Permalink | No Comments »
03.21.08By Val Ubell
In my last blog, I referenced a ‘vintage’ book I found in our home library called “Encyclopedia of Political Buttons United States 1896-1972.” It has numerous pictures of political buttons and gives a little history on the Presidential candidates, winners and losers. The values in this book have most likely changed quite dramatically and we understand there are a lot of reproductions out there.
It is quite a fascinating and a great way to view our country’s history. My last blog ended with FDR being elected in 1944, for a fourth term. While candidate Wendell Willkie did not win in 1940, his buttons were a hoot! I found one with an elephant ‘blowing away” the competition (a Democrat/donkey.) This was rather unique!

Another theme in his buttons was in reference to not being capable of serving a third term. One example is “Confucius say…man who stand up twice, no good third time” and “No Man is Any Good the Third Time.”

I would not have thought any message this ’suggestive’ would have been acceptable way back then. Willkie’s button with a critter in a barrel, denoting poverty under FDR’s administration did not work either.

In 1944 the candidate against FDR was Thomas E. Dewey. FDR beat him by a substantial margin. In February, FDR met with Stalin and Churchill to lay plans for peace. Upon his return, it was evident that he was tired and ill and on April 12, 1945, he died. Harry S. Truman then became President.
Truman was not very popular and had to work very hard. He was determined not to lose the election in 1948 and made numerous campaign trips throughout the country and presented himself as “the plain people’s President against the privileged people’s Congress.” His plan worked and he beat out Thomas E. Dewey.

The 1952 election had Dwight D. Eisenhower vs. Adlai Stevenson. Ike won in ‘52 and then again in ‘56. It sure looks like the pinbacks became more fun – smiling faces , nicknames of Ike and Dick, sounds more warm and fuzzy than Adlai and Estes, don’t you think?

Then came the JFK election, 1960. You cannot help but think that folks wanted to wear his buttons just for the smiling, handsome face on their lapels.

Kennedy won the election (vs. Richard Nixon) but sadly, was assassinated and did not get to finish the term. Lyndon B. Johnson became President. He ran again in 1964 and won, with Hubert Humphrey as Vice President. He ran against Barry Goldwater. Goldwater’s slogan was “In your Heart, you Know He’s Right..” LBJ had another take on this philosophy with “In Your Guts You Know He’s Nuts.” We imagine that this button is a hard one to find!

I am sure you political button collectors are always on the look-out. You will know which ones are real, or ‘fantasy’, or reproductions. It is helpful if you know the early makers of celluloid buttons such as Whitehead & Hoag, American Art Works, Bastian Bros., St. Louis Button Company and Torsh & Franz. Lithographed buttons were heavily produced starting in the 1920’s and the Green Duck Co. of Chicago, Illinois has been the largest manufacturer. I actually got a ‘lot’ of buttons at an auction once and was fooled until I carefully read the side of one. They had been reproduced by Kleenex in the 1970s. As is true with any collectible, do your homework, know the source you are buying from and enjoy!
Permalink | 2 Comments »
02.19.08By Kristin McGowan
This country is awash in revered institutions with four-letter abbreviations. NASA. NCAA. AARP. The list goes on.
Here’s a new one for you: APIC.
Never heard of it? It’s short for the American Political Items Collectors—and “new” is perhaps misleading, since the organization has been around since the end of World War II. According to its website, http://apic.us, through the years the APIC has counted among its ranks “educators; students; archivists; historians; elected officials, including members of Congress; political junkies; political animals; campaign staffers; journalists from print, broadcast, and cable; museum curators; and even a couple of past presidents.”

That’s a distinguished crowd.
At present the APIC has several thousand members, and chatting with a sampling of its current-day faithful—a few of whom have themselves been around since the end of World War II—made for an entertaining afternoon at the Chelsea Jewish Community Center in Manhattan on Sunday, February 3rd.
The occasion was the APIC’s New York City Political Collectors Show, an annual affair where vendors buy, sell, and swap political memorabilia from all eras: from the days of the original George W (the Founding Father, that is) to that of our present-day, unpompadoured George.
Tony Lee, president of the Big Apple chapter of the APIC and the ringleader of the event, said it has been held annually for the last twenty-seven years. He noted that although this NYC gathering is “probably the smallest show of the hobby” in terms of the amount of paraphernalia on display, it’s also one of the most popular, since it’s within striking distance for so many aficionados.
Those who came from near or far found a treasure trove of lovingly preserved political artifacts. A cigar box promoting James G. Blaine, the Republican presidential nominee who lost to Grover Cleveland in 1884, was stickered at $45. A ballot used to elect James Buchanan in 1856, which APIC old-timer Charles McSorley bought for the bargain rate of forty cents two years ago, was now more properly selling for $100. McSorley was also peddling a well-preserved photo of a youthful Abraham Lincoln, his hero, for $750 (“Nobody ever lost money with Lincoln,” he asserted). An autographed copy of Hillary Clinton’s bestseller Living History was going for $129. A pair of license plates, one reading “I’m for Dewey” and its twin proclaiming “I’m for Truman,” were among the higher priced items of the show; the asking price for the two: $2250.
And, last but not least, scattered across tabletops throughout the room was a spectacular assortment of political buttons.

Ah, the buttons. Every year they’re the centerpiece of the show, and rightfully so: the APIC website explains that the campaign button is “the most recognized and widely collected of all campaign objects.” APIC member Mark Evans, whose business card says that he specializes in “The Stuff Your Mother Made You Throw Out,” provided a quickie tutorial on the storied history of the campaign button—which, as it turns out, is as old as the Union itself.
“Washington didn’t have any opposition, so there wasn’t really a race,” Evans explained—Hillary and Barack, eat your hearts out—“but they had commemorative metal buttons that you would sew onto your vest or coat.” In the mid-1800s, Evans said, with the advent of photography, the campaign button of choice was a little metal badge sporting a photo of, say, John Fremont, or Stephen Douglas, or Charlie McSorley’s beloved Lincoln. Then came 1896, the year that blew the roof off the button business: that’s when the celluloid button was invented, using pretty much the same technique that’s used today, and clearing the way for the barrage of buttons touting—or taunting—every candidate worth his or her salt in the century-plus since.
Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of these buttons were on display at Sunday’s event: buttons the size of your hand and buttons the size of your thumb; garish buttons and more tasteful ones; buttons designed to buoy a favorite candidate, knock down a competitor, or merely entertain the politically savvy or the public at large.
Evans’ wares included a caseful of George McGovern buttons—none of which could prevent McGovern from being steamrolled by Nixon in ’72. Others spotted around the room: a Bush button—the future Bush 43, that is—from the 1998 Republican State convention in Forth Worth, Texas; a button reading “The Country Needs Fixin’, Elect Nixon;” another urging you to “Soar to New Heights with Barack Obama” and picturing a buff, cartoonish Obama dressed like the superhero; and an oversized button that gloated, inexplicably, “I Told You So.”
But no discussion of the political-button universe is complete without a mention of the king of the mass-produced political zinger, Mort Berkowitz. With a clipped mustache, an accent that screams New Yorker, and a sense of humor drier than the Sahara Desert, Berkowitz is one character you can’t miss—and wouldn’t want to.
The buttons he and his company, Bold Concepts, have churned out are legion and legendary. Consider that he is the brains behind such classics as “Hillary Rodman Clinton: As Bad As She Wants to Be,” which pictured the then-First Lady with a wildly colorful hairdo akin to that of the Pistons’ former free spirit Dennis Rodman; a button that tweaked Ronald Reagan as “The Flaw in the Theory of Evolution;” a ’70s button celebrating the fact that “Nixon Has a Staff Infection;” and the modern-day classic “Obama, You Barack My World.” Berkowitz claims to have created eighty buttons on the subject of Watergate alone, and to have produced five hundred so far for the current presidential contest.
Which party does he skewer more? Berkowitz calls himself “an equal opportunity offender.” When asked about his own political leanings, he would only say, his expression deadpan except for the twinkle in his eye, “I lean. I lean.” It wasn’t so much deliberate secrecy as the active enjoyment he so obviously derived from not providing a satisfactory answer. He was droll, a charming curmudgeon, a “piece o’ work,” as they say. Another question posed to him was, If there were a button promoting you, what would it say? Alas, he sidestepped the query.
Make sure you take a look at some of the interesting finds at the APIC Convention right here in our community section.
Permalink | No Comments »
03.06.06By Deanna Dahlsad
When discussing political collectibles, there are the strange, and then there are the tacky. And in my opinion, little is tackier than Nixon.
You know, I say this with affection, as I am collector of Nixon items and oddities.
It began with spying a “Liberated Lovelies for Nixon 1972″ button. And it might have stopped there — if the anti-button for 72 hadn’t been right there as well… But who could pass that up?!
Nixon naughtiness is out there, and I must have it.
Since those first purchases, I’ve kept my eyes open for more Nixon items.
“Yes Nixon, No Jelly,” a tab from a candy company to promote their ‘Peanut Butter No Jelly’ candy bar during the campaign. It is interesting to note that the candy bar, like the President, is no longer… I imagine more folks miss the candy bar.
Yes, there was a matching McGovern one too, but I like mocking Nixon - & I have quite the Anti-Nixon collection to prove it! *neener neener*
There are a few reasons why Nixon is so easy to mock. One’s the man himself. The other is that Watergate changed the way we looked at our politicians and leaders. With this new awareness, or cynicism, Nixon spawned more ’stuff’ than you can imagine.
Some of my personal favorites are the National Watergate Test booklet and the Watergate Coloring Book, where you can “color the facts” yourself.
Speaking of Sticky-Tricky-Dicky… How about these “Win With Dick” Bubble Gum Cigars?!
When looking for Nixon collectibles, I recommend NixonButtons.com. This is the website of Eldon Almquist, who runs Nixon Collector’s Organization, and the man who litterally wrote the book on Nixon collectibles (The Political collectibles of Richard M. Nixon).
While the book is sadly out of print, you can contact him via his website.
Permalink | 2 Comments »
02.27.06By Deanna Dahlsad
 Political collecting can be a strange area. Not just because politicians are strange, but because the details may not transfer with time.
Culture, pop culture especially, is a funny thing that way.
There are specific issues that defined the times, the climates in which men (and a few women) ran for public office. Political slogans & emblems are often mysterious or strange years later because the reasons for the symbol or even the political issue itself is no longer ‘important,’ perhaps it is even no longer remembered.
Looking at them now, you learn a lot about American history. OK, sometimes you laugh too, either at the symbols or the issues, or the freakin’ candidates themselves. But looking at political collectibles is rarely boring.
For example, did you know that the Republicans have used other symbols besides the elephant? Did you know one of them was a dinner pail?!
Starting around 1894, the pail symbolized the party’s commitment to protecting American industry and labor by supporting a tariff on imports & to advocate full employment. It was first used on the all-important political campaign buttons (or pin backs) in the 1900 campaign, with over 15 different versions.
It was so popular with the Republicans that this pail symbol was used until the Depression.
Pins & buttons have always been popular. And confusing. Like those shown above. The chemical symbols for gold &/or water, were displayed on items supporting Barry Goldwater for president in 1964. And the”Willkie Says Spinach is Spinach—It Sure Is, Franklin” is something you’d likely never guess…
This button was derived from a New Yorker cartoon, in which a kid tries some broccoli, then pushes her plate away with the words “I say it’s spinach and to hell with it.” The button’s message is that Willkie would ‘tell it like it is.’

But political campaigns have used more than the traditional buttons to promote candidates & issues. Ceramics, glass, bandannas, canes, hats, jewelry, lampshades & pipes have been used to carry the message, the face & the slogans of candidates & parties. Even cigars have been a powerful political symbol through the years. (Struggling to refrain from any Clinton comments!)
Where-ever there has been a symbol available to rally the public, it has been used as well.
In 1901, the political news was about the organized power of the railroads and how it concerned the finances of the farmer. A popular novel about farmers and the Railroad Trust was titled “The Octopus” inspired this glass flask.
The ‘odd’ orange octopus covering this milk-glass silver-dollar flask is an example of such symbolism, and while it may not be the same message used with today’s symbolism of the octopus, it is still valued by collectors today — In fact this flask, dating to 1901, sold for $1,000 at a Glass Works Auction in East Greenville, Pa.
Like the octopus, many political collectibles are hiding their political connections — and thus their interesting stories. Like this stick pin.
Stamped “Carry A Nation” this hatchet stick pin might be overlooked by the average person at a flea market who didn’t know of it’s importance. “Carry A Nation” was not just a slogan, it’s the name of Carry A. Nation, one of the leaders of the temperance movement. The short version of the fascinating story of Carry is that of a woman called by God to rid her country of the ills of alcohol. She became so frustrated with the lack of enforcement of temperance law that on June 1, 1900, she smashed her first saloon. Thus, the hatchet pins were sold to supporters to raise funds for the cause.
Perhaps the oddest political collectible that I’ve seen yet is this century-old “soap baby.” This baby wears a tag that says “My Papa will vote for McKinley,” but there were those endorsing Bryan as well. (And Bryan ones are much rarer now than ones promoting McKinley.)
The soap baby was used in the election of 1896, aka Republican William McKinley vs. Democrat William Jennings Bryan.
McKinley items are very popular to collectors as this was one of the first ‘modern’ political campaigns — the amount of advertising material put out (by both candidates) was huge.
Even if you are not a person who values the cultural or historical value of political collectibles, or, dare I think it, you lack the ability to value the hysterical in many of these items, keep your eyes out for unusual political pieces — They sell for high prices!
The soap babies, while maybe fetching auction prices of $15 to $30 (for McKinley anyway), are given replacement values of $75 by insurance companies - indicating they will only rise in value. The dinner pail pin above, in nice conditions, sells for well over $100 (and that was in 1997!)
The rare items, older candidates, etc. will fetch the highest prices, but even some more ’modern’ candidates have larger price tags. (Think “Kennedy” — Heck, if it was worn by a Kennedy, or sneezed on by a Kennedy… But ‘that *snot* glamorous‘ is it?) And who knows what the present day campaign bumper stickers, pins, sweatshirts, comics, etc. will fetch at the auctions of decades from now?
So while you search flea markets for the old campaign trail items, pack away a few ‘classics’ from current elections — even local political office campaigns too… You never know where that bum in office will end up!
Permalink | 1 Comment »
|