The Black, White and Shades of Grey in Collecting Black Americana
12.28.06 By Deanna Dahlsad
Once black Americana was a collectibles area reserved for blacks ‘of a certain age’, including celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey, Bill Cosby, Spike Lee, and Whoopie Goldberg, who wished to chronicle and document the struggles of their race, or historians of many colors. One collector told Pamela Wiggins why she collects and decorates her home with black Americana items: “I had to ask why she’d be interested in owning something so offensive… She wanted to own all types of Black Americana because they were a reflection of her cultural heritage. Her ancestors dealt with more hardships than she would, thankfully, ever know. But acknowledging these difficulties and triumphs through her varied collection reflected an important aspect of her lineage when incorporated into her home’s decor.”
But now younger African-Americans and others are buying these items and reproductions to decorate their homes. Some without the same motivations.
According to Howard Dodson, director of the New York Public Library’s Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture, “There are two kinds of collectors of black Americana: those who are interested in collecting as a financial investment and those with a passion for finding ‘the missing pages of history.’”
Black Americana certainly is a wise investment. In an area where much was destroyed because it was offensive, ugly and degrading — destroyed as we Americans tried to purge the proof of our racism — authentic items are rapidly increasing in value. (It is also said that many African-Americans bought lots of racist items in the 1970’s and then promptly destroyed it all.)
Even reproductions have more value than you might think as collectors want to get their hands on something.
However, along with the usual concerns that valuable documentation of our history is not being properly saved, there is the question: Should Black Americana Be Bought & Sold?
There is also some concern that part of the drive in purchasing black Americana is pimpin’ black culture. That this adoption of old images and negative stereo-types is being glamorized in a perverse way. Like hip-hop’s bad ‘rap’ (pun intended), collecting black Americana is sweeping the nation in a concerning way.
Perhaps most concerning to me, a white woman of a certain age, is the number of white folks who are buying reproductions of black lawn jockeys.
Yes, white people with black lawn jockeys. In 2006 (and 2007 too, I guess).
Some claim it is to validate and honor Jocko Graves, the son of a free black soldier named Thomas Graves, who fought with George Washington. The story goes that Washington assigned the youth to safely remain on the Pennsylvania shore with the horses while they crossed the Delaware. Jocko was also to keep a lantern burning so George and the soldiers would know where to return after battle. When Washington and his army returned they discovered Jocko had frozen to death — still holding the horses and the lit lantern.
The story continues that Washington was so moved by Jocko’s devotion that he commissioned a statue in Jocko’s honor. Titled “Faithful Groomsman” the statue stood at Mount Vernon in honor of the young patriot.
This story is, at least in part, presented by Waymon LeFall who has written a children’s book, “The Legend of Jocko, Hero of the American Revolution”, as what he calls “a missing piece of African American history”. LeFall says that “lawn jockeys are not racist reminders of the days of slavery but monuments to an African American hero.”
But Professor Kenneth Goings, chairman of African-American and African Studies at Ohio State University and the author of the 1995 book “Mammy and Uncle Mose: Black Collectibles and American Stereotyping”, says this legend isn’t true. And in an October interview with ‘The Daily Journal’ Goings says the lawn jockeys are “very, very much racist symbols” and says that he’s amazed people can believe anything else. He continued to say black lawn jockeys are part of the Old South mythology: “They are meant to evoke that Old South, grand plantation, “Gone With the Wind” mythology, and I’m not sure they can evoke anything else.”
As a white woman perhaps I shouldn’t say anything on the subject of such racist symbols and what they mean… Afterall, I don’t want a man telling me (or the world) how to feel about witchhunts and symbols of misogyny. But ‘I do declare’, the black lawn jockey shouldn’t be on any white person’s property.
If you aren’t black and you collect black Americana, at least keep it within your home where it can have the context of your explanation — that it is for historical reasons, family ties, belief in Jocko’s patriotism, or whatever non-racist interest you have.
Don’t get me wrong, I completely appreciate the intentions in preserving the vanishing American history — and interest in the black experience. (I do the same in the name of feminism.) But if you’re white and have a black lawn jockey, don’t expect anyone else to know you believe in Jocko or that you’re a history buff. Don’t expect them to visit you to find out what your reason is.
================
Gotta Collect? Then You Gotta Connect - Join our Collectors’ Community!











April 9th, 2007 at 3:27 am
[...] But what of the objects culturally removed? Like Black Americana, old ‘Injun’ cocktail shakers, anti-Japanese WWII cartoons, and other racist renderings have been removed from our culture for their inappropriateness. Collectors rush to preserve these (horrid) moments in time. [...]
July 4th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
I don’t care what anyone thinks of what I collect, whether it’s a Mammy cookie jar or a Speedy Gonzales drinking glass.
What’s the saying, “People in glass houses…”? I’m sure if anyone objected to my collectibles, I’d find SOMETHING offensive about them (e.g. their daughter dressing inappropriately, their Playboy magazine, their 50 Cent CD, their poor hygiene habits — I’m more grossed out by people not washing their hands after using the restroom than I am about most other things).
September 25th, 2007 at 5:14 am
its weird how you have turned black/negro artifact collecting in to some undergournd dont let anyone know you do it hobby, like being in the closet, or a communist or something, the very fact that people choose to judge me makes them in fact by defintion intolerant and judgemental , therefore, bigots
September 25th, 2007 at 5:54 am
I don’t think I’ve said anything of the kind, Steven. I may have quoted/cited others who have, but I don’t see where I have said “don’t do it” or “don’t let anyone know you do it.” I cautioned about the lawn jockey on display — you simply don’t have the opportunity to address the issue with people who pass by.
If that is what you think makes me a bigot — my understanding of the world we live in, that we do not live alone in some vacuum and you can hurt/offend others — then I suggest you mistake bigotry for sensitivity to the concern of others.
September 25th, 2007 at 9:03 am
Deanna makes a perfectly valid point. Of course we have the ‘right’ to do whatever we want within the confines of the law, offensive or not, but we ALWAYS run the risk of being horribly misperceived when the cultural bias runs counter to our actions, no matter what our intent is. It’s wiser to display these things in a context where we can interact and discuss them with people who might see them.
The exact same things can be said about Nazi memorabilia - would you hang a swastika on your house in order to remember the plight of the Jews?
March 9th, 2008 at 5:01 am
Wilmingtonsportsregion1197$anchor$basketball Betting,final Four,final Four Betting,final Four Gambling,final Four Sports Book,final Four Sportsbook,march Madness,march Madness Betting,march Madness Gambling,march Madness Sports Book,march Madness Spo…
Wilmingtonsportsregion1197$anchor$basketball Betting,final Four,final Four Betting,final Four Gambling,final Four Sports Book,final Four Sportsbook,march Madness,march Madness Betting,march Madness Gambling,march Madness Sports Book,march Madness Sport…